Non sequitur
Table of Content:
Non sequitur
- Non sequitur: The conclusion does not follow from the premises.
The non sequitur fallacy is a type of flawed reasoning where the conclusion of an argument does not logically follow from the premises or evidence provided. In other words, the argument's conclusion doesn't make sense in the context of the information presented. The term "non sequitur" is Latin for "it does not follow."
This fallacy occurs when there's a disconnect between the premises and the conclusion – even if the premises are true, they don't lead to the conclusion in a coherent or logical way.
Here's a simplified example:
Person A: "I heard that the weather forecast predicts rain tomorrow."
Person B: "I just bought a new umbrella, so I'm going to do well on my math test."
In this example, Person B is using a non sequitur fallacy. The fact that they bought a new umbrella doesn't logically relate to doing well on a math test. There's no logical connection between the two statements, and the conclusion doesn't follow from the premise.
Non sequitur fallacies can make arguments seem disjointed or confusing because the conclusion doesn't flow naturally from the provided evidence or premises.
Overall, the non sequitur fallacy is a type of faulty reasoning where the argument's conclusion doesn't logically follow from the premises, creating a disconnect that weakens the overall validity of the argument.